Challenges to dominant area studies paradigms and the study of bounded entities have provided a welcome new focus on processes of connectivity and interaction in human societies, including the ancient societies studied by archaeologists.\u00a0 Linked to this has been a growing interest in ancient processes of globalisation, which has drawn attention to the biases of the narrative of Eurocentric globalisation by situating cross-cultural contact and commerce in its long dur\u00e9e context.\u00a0 Despite these developments, however, archaeological analyses of ancient long-distance networks of commerce and exchange have continued to retain a very traditional focus on agrarian, and in particular state-level societies.\u00a0 Yet in the deeper past dealt with by many archaeologists, even the most powerful agrarian states were often of limited reach and power, and relied heavily on the activities of a range of more mobile non-agrarian to interlink them, access non-agrarian environments and their products and indeed provide a number of the critical components of an increasingly connected world.\u00a0 These societies were not timeless groups who failed to adopt agriculture, but specialised components of an increasingly complex world.\u00a0 This session will focus on these groups \u2013 the pastoralists, sea nomads, foragers, forager-traders and others who have more commonly been seen, as argued some decades ago by Eric Wolf, as \u2018people without history\u2019.\u00a0 It will examine the role of the archaeological record in shedding light on such groups, and in particular will explore the contribution of such societies to the emergence and maintenance of ancient networks of commerce, cultural exchange and biological translocation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Conference Session: Society for American Archaeology, 3-7 April, 2013, Honolulu Globalisation and the people without history Session organisers: Nicole Boivin (University of Oxford) & Michael Frachetti (Washington University in St Louis) Challenges to dominant area studies paradigms and the study of bounded entities have provided a welcome new focus on processes of connectivity and interaction […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":670,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-events"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=410"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":720,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/410\/revisions\/720"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/670"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sealinksproject.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}